Israel – Lebanon maritime talks to be postponed

Spread the love

Islam News – Press TV reported – Officials on both sides say, next round of Israel – Lebanon maritime indirect negotiations on the demarcation of Lebanese southern maritime border with the occupying regime has been postponed.

“We were officially informed of the postponing of the indirect round of negotiations,” a Lebanese military official, who spoke on condition of anonymity told AFP on Monday.

The official also said US-mediated maritime border talks, scheduled to take place Wednesday, were delayed due to Israel’s rejection of Lebanese proposals.

The official further said a separate US-Lebanese meeting would be held instead, adding that the “search for common ground” would continue.

Separately on Monday, Israeli energy minister Yuval Steinitz also said it had been agreed with the Americans that the talks would be postponed for a few weeks.

“In the interim, they will do some shuttling in order to better prepare the next round of talks,” he said.

Last week, Steinitz accused Lebanon of changing its stance in the negotiations too many times.

The opening round of indirect negotiations between the two sides was held at the headquarters of the UN peacekeeping force in the southern Lebanese city of Naqoura on October 14.

Hosted by the UN and mediated by the US, the meeting broke up after barely an hour, and the two sides agreed to hold the next round of discussions on October 28.

So far, no breakthrough had been achieved.

Lebanon is locked in a conflict with Israel over an area in the Mediterranean Sea spanning about 860 square kilometers, known as Zone No. 9, which is rich in oil and gas.

Unlike land borders between, the maritime frontiers have not seen any military clashes.

Beirut eyes the issue of delineation of its southern border zone with great sensitivity both due to concerns of Israel’s expansionist attitude and given its plans to engage in oil and gas exploration in its share of the Mediterranean.

Lebanese officials have, time and again, asserted that the limited border talks do not signify “normalization” or “reconciliation” with the occupying regime.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *